Great Falls, Montana — The Associated Press Published on Sunday, May. 16, 2010 12:27AM EDT Last updated on Sunday, May. 16, 2010 12:32AM EDT
Public hearings in Montana are being held this week to discuss a plan to build a pipeline through eastern Montana to move crude extracted from Alberta’s oil sands to refineries in the United States.
Calgary-based TransCanada Corp. aims to start construction this year on the nearly 3,200-kilometre-long Keystone XL pipeline.
The first of six meetings is planned for Monday in Malta. Additional meetings are set in Glasgow, Terry, Circle and Glendive. The final meeting is Thursday in Baker.TransCanada is proposing to pay landowners for the right to install pipe a little more than a metre underground.
“I would like to encourage all citizens, if they have any concerns about the safety and environmental impact of this, to go to the comment periods and speak up,” said Sandra Barnick, a landowner in the path of the pipeline and one of 40 members of the Northern Pipeline Landowners Group.
“What we are taking a stand on is making sure we are treated fairly and that regulations are adhered to and that there is equitable compensation for everybody along the pipeline,” Ms. Barnick said.
Jeff Rauh, TransCanada spokesman, said a draft environmental study found the impact of a potential oil spill to be minimal, and the pipeline could be shut down if there were a problem.“The risk of an oil spill is small,” Mr. Rauh said. “If a spill occurred, the volume spilled would likely be small.”
Tom Ring, of the state Department of Environmental Quality, said the state's preferred route for the pipeline is slightly different from the one proposed by TransCanada to limit impacts on stream crossings and landowners.
Under political pressure, the company said it is considering letting Montana and North Dakota crude oil into the pipeline. The company previously rebuffed calls to build an “onramp” for crude from the Bakken oil fields of Montana, North Dakota and Saskatchewan, saying there was insufficient demand.
The Bakken formation holds an estimated 3.65 billion barrels of oil, much less than the 1.7 trillion barrels of petroleum in the oil sands.
(http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/debate-over-cross-border-pipeline-poised-to-heat-up-at-us-town-halls/article1570420/?cmpid=rss1&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheGlobeAndMail-National+(The+Globe+and+Mail+-+National+News)&utm_content=Google+International)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment